As your representative to the NH Legislature, I ran for my second term to restore the attributes that have made New Hampshire so unique and attractive. Since 2007, and in spite of the worsening economy, the Democratic majority in the Legislature increased spending by over 24%, introduced some 80 new taxes and fees, and increased regulations that infringe on both businesses and families.

These increases have placed New Hampshire as one of the highest business taxes and regulatory burdened states in the nation, making businesses reluctant to create the jobs needed for families to live and prosper in this beautiful state. As the Finance Division II Chair, I've been working to bring fiscal discipline and efficiency to balance the state budget without new statewide taxes, shifting costs to municipalities, or borrowing from our grandchildren. The Legislature has passed draft amendments to the NH Constitution to eliminate the unfair and ineffective donor town state tax that is scheduled to return in 2011, along with legislation to avoid implementing the new plan in 2011 and 2012 .

In a nutshell, the Legislature is creating an environment that will free towns, businesses and individuals to prosper in the state, which will restore the growth of jobs we enjoyed prior to 2007.

Recent Updates

April 5 Update

March activity remained high, as the Legislature faced the March 29 “crossover” deadline, when all bills passed by the House are sent to the Senate, and vice versa.

Once again, there were a large number of bills focused on Education Reform.  Bills passing included HB 1607, which establishes a tax credit for NH businesses to provide scholarships for below-median income families to make it easier to send their children to private schools.  Similar programs have been set up in 9 other states, and appear to be working to provide parents with choice of schools.  HB 1202 clarified the requirement that a charter school’s student home district is responsible for supporting vocational education for the student.  HB 1403 allows parents to withdraw their children from the International Baccalaureate Program.  HB 1583 allows teachers to maintain class discipline by use of reasonable force to control unruly students.  HB 1703 requires school boards to provide basic financial literacy as part of the educational program.  State aid to support school building construction will be provided up front to towns in the future, thus avoiding accruing the mountain of liability that has resulted from the current approach of yearly payment support (HB 533).

Read more »

February 26, 2011 Update

February was a busy month for bills related to education reform.  I published an Op Ed on this subject in the Portsmouth Herald (see my website), in which I stated my view that parents have primary responsibility for their children’s education, and that the public school system is only one of the means to achieve the goal of a well-educated society.  HB 1225 permits public charter schools to incur long-term debt, which is essential to enable them to build permanent facilities. HB 1360 requires the Board of Education to submit their proposed adoption of the national Common Core Standards (CCS) in NH to the Legislature for approval. CCS would bring significant change to our public curriculum, and needs adequate public input before it is implemented.  HB 1383 limits the award of in-state University System tuition to US citizens.  HB 1566 streamlines the process for a school district to withdraw from its SAU.  HB 1461 requires public schools to notify parents of events involving controversial outside speakers and allows them to opt their children out.  HB 1571 reduces the level of bureaucracy imposed on home schooling parents.  These bills passed the House.

The Senate, with support of Governor Lynch, amended CACR 12 (the proposed constitutional amendment to allow targeted aid to schools) to require that the Legislature remain “responsible” for education in the state.  While I have concerns over possible future interpretations by the court of this “responsibility”, I think the Amendment is an improvement over the current situation, and hopefully will allow the permanent elimination of Donor Towns in the state.  The bill will now come back to the House for approval before it goes to the voters.

Read more »

2/12 Op Ed in Portsmouth Herald: A Case for Public School Reform

A campaign appears underway to portray the Republican Legislature as ‘attacking public schools’, and it needs some response.  There is certainly a frustration among those of us who care deeply about the education of our children, who will need to compete successfully in the global economy.  Massive increases in spending on our public schools have been underway over the past several decades without noticeable improvement in education levels.  Despite our spending level per pupil being near the top internationally, American students’ competency scores, once among the best compared to other developed countries, have been falling, and now rate around average.  Of 34 developed countries, we are 14th in reading, 17th in science and 25th in math.  Most interestingly, China-Shanghai is now reporting its results to the same tests, and has come out first among all countries.  At the same time, US businesses report that our graduates require training in the basics in order to contribute effectively at work.

NH is spending over $2.8 billion on public schools this year, a 2.7% increase over last year. We spend annually over $14,000/student, compared with average US spending reported to be around $9,200/student.  In spite of claims to the contrary, the Legislature did not reduce state support to education this year. In fact, it restored $150 million that were omitted from the Governor’s budget (for items such as catastrophic special education aid and existing school building construction aid), so we would not downshift costs to our cities and towns.  The Legislature also essentially eliminated the unpopular “donor town” practice, which moved funds from one town to another.

Read more »

January 21, 2012 Update

The House opened the New Year with its first session January 4-5th.  The first order of business was to hold override votes on the remaining 5 bills vetoed by Gov. Lynch last year.  HB542, a bill to provide parents greater control over their children being taught objectionable subject matter, had failed an override vote last November.  The House voted to reconsider, and then overrode the veto 256-115.  I believe this is a positive step toward parental decision authority in their child’s education.  The veto of SB57, which repeals the ban passed in 2010 on car title loan companies, was overridden 248-123.  Opponents of title loans objected to the high interest rates charged, whereas I believe that there are times that loans can be desperately needed for short intervals, in instances that banks will not provide loans.  Title loans can meet these needs, and avoid what could be very negative consequences if alternatives are unavailable.  Unfortunately, the Governor’s veto of HB218, which would restrict spending on rail transport studies in NH, was sustained 231-128 (a 2/3 vote is required to override).  I felt that NH is too rural a state to support profitable passenger rail service, and public bus systems are economically more viable for us.  The veto of HB380, which would have continued the Commission on the Status of Men, was also sustained.  I believe that the Governor had missed the redirection of this Commission’s focus onto finding ways of increasing the participation of fathers in rearing their children, but nevertheless I recommended against override, as I have introduced HB1710, which addresses this issue directly. Families without the presence of fathers are strongly correlated with poverty, disadvantaged children and high social services expense.

Read more »

Portsmouth Herald Op Ed 12/18/11

In an Op Ed for the Herald titled “Let’s get honest about Right to Work bill”, Democratic House Leader Terie Norelli attacked the honesty of those who support the Right to Work bill.  Not only does this stretch the bounds of civil discourse, but also her arguments themselves leave something to be desired in objectivity and accuracy.

 

She dismisses the argument that RTW will bring jobs to NH by pointing to failure of the Speaker to name specific examples of jobs that would come to NH. However, US Department of Labor data show that growth in the civilian labor force was 14.4% over the last decade in RTW states, compared to 5.3% in non-RTW states, and 8.5% in NH.  She then claims that the real result of RTW is the “reduction in wages and benefits for working people.”  Again, Department of Labor data show that growth in real private-sector employee compensation over the past decade was 11.3% in RTW states compared with  .7% in non-RTW states, and 4.1% in NH. While it is true that median income in non-RTW states is higher, so is their cost of living, so that it is unclear how RTW affects standards of living.

 

Rep. Norelli goes on to ‘debunk’ the claim that states with RTW laws have stronger job markets and lower unemployment than states without.  She ‘proves’ this by stating that NH has the highest median income in the country and the lowest unemployment rate of any state east of the Mississippi River.  According to the Census Bureau, NH has the 7th highest median household income among the states, but this has nothing to do with the argument on RTW.  Regarding unemployment, it turns out that the three states with lower unemployment rates than NH are all RTW states, and 10 of the lowest 14 unemployment rates are in RTW states.  It has been asserted by several business relocation firms that many of their manufacturing customers refuse to relocate to a state that does not have RTW.  Can we imagine the good to the NH economy that would result from the moving of a major manufacturing facility such a Boeing to our state?  Perhaps that would happen if we were the only RTW state in the Northeast.

 

It cannot be proved that RTW will significantly improve the jobs situation in NH, but nor can it be proved that it would not.  Many other factors influence creation of jobs.  These include tax rates, cost of energy, the quality and education of the workforce, and the overall business climate.  The CNBC ‘Survey of Top States for Business in 2011’ rates the states in terms of ‘workforce’.  Of the top half, only 3 are not RTW.  NH is ranked 40th.  Taking in all the factors they considered, including cost of business, quality of life, infrastructure, education, cost of living, etc., NH ranks 17th overall, with 10 RTW states rated higher.

 

Rep. Norelli then goes on to attack the budget passed in June and points out that NH unemployment is now higher than it was in June.  The rate has now fallen to 5.2%, but was 5.6% in January, when the Republicans took over the Legislature.  Of course, none of this has anything to do with RTW.

 

In my opinion, these arguments do not go to the heart of the issue.  RTW is about individual freedom.  A major purpose of RTW is to benefit union employees, giving them greater freedom of choice, and thus more influence over labor bosses, who will need to treat union members as ‘customers’, and not take them for granted.  Forcing all employees to pay into unions is simply wrong. The argument that the Taft Hartley bill does not require union membership misses the fact that union contracts often do require payment of “agency fees” for collective bargaining.  Union claims that this is only ‘fair’ for the services rendered were shown to be false when union lobbyists pushed strongly for the removal of the provision in the RTW bill that would have eliminated the requirement for applying collective bargaining results to nonunion employees.

 

Dues are used for many purposes that are not supported by all employees, such as for high pay and luxurious conferences for the labor bosses (like the one recently held in Puerto Rico). Much more serious is that dues support the flow of big dollars into political campaigns.  According to the Center for Responsive Politics, union contributions from 1990-2008 totaled over $500 million, with 95% of all contributions flowing to Democrats.  With this huge influx of money, no wonder that not one single Democrat voted for RTW in this year’s failed 240-139 House vote to override Governor Lynch’s veto.  (A two-thirds majority is needed to override).  What is surprising is that 41 Republicans joined them.

Legislative Update Dec. 15, 2011

The House met in special session on November 30 to consider Governor Lynch’s proposed wording for a constitution amendment to establish Legislative authority to define state funding for education.  The wording was not ideal from my point of view, in that it could be interpreted as requiring the Legislature to provide state funding for education, but I voted for it since it was an improvement over the current situation.  The bill failed, however, 114-264.  There will be further discussions in both House and Senate on attempting to pass a version of this constitution amendment (CACR 12)

The House failed to override the Governors veto of HB 474, Right to Work, by a vote of 240-139, which was 13 votes short of the 2/3 necessary.  An article I just submitted on this topic to the Portsmouth Herald is printed below.  The House also unfortunately failed to overturn his veto of HB 542 by a vote of 244-130.  This bill would have strengthened parents’ control over what their children would be exposed to in school.  In both cases, I have introduced bills in the next session of the Legislature that would address these issues in different ways.

Read more »

Republican legislators stand strong with O’Brien

 

November 01, 2011 2:00 AM

To the Editor (Seacoast On-Line):

If you choose to listen to the few disgruntled Republicans in the New Hampshire House of Representatives, you might believe that House Republicans are ready to distance ourselves from Speaker O’Brien and begin positioning for re-election by shedding our principles. On the contrary, we remain committed to defending the N.H. Constitution which we swore to uphold, advancing sound conservative values like personal responsibility and frugality, and representing the taxpayers who elected us. Just because some few Republicans seem to place little value in our party’s platform or the promises we made to the people of New Hampshire, that does not represent how the majority of us feel.

Speaker O’Brien has provided steady, even-handed leadership that has resulted in lower spending, a balanced budget without raising taxes, less regulation, and much-needed state pension system reform. These are all long-held party platform issues and principles held by most House Republicans. If we were to legislate whimsically or place politics above policy, then we not only fail ourselves, we fail the good people who swept us into office.

Rather than setting our principles aside because some in the party fear Election Day reprisals in 2012, we intend to stay the course and finish the job we were elected to do. We stand strong with Speaker O’Brien because we believe he is committed and capable of keeping the best interests of the people of New Hampshire central to everything we do in the New Hampshire House of Representatives.

(signed by 33 Representatives)

 

Legislative Update Nov. 4, 2001

The House met in special session on September 14 and October 12 to override two of Governor Lynch’s vetoes, of SB 88 (strengthening protection of use of firearms for self-defense) and SB 91 (overturning existing ordinances to require sprinklers in manufactured housing units).  I voted for override in both cases, as I felt that self-defense is a fundamental right for all citizens, and that sprinkler requirements in manufactured housing units are of limited value and high cost (buildings must be approved by local fire marshals, so a universal sprinkler law is not required).

The Senate was unfortunately unable to override the Governor’s veto of SB 154 (removing NH from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative) and SB 129 (requiring photo ID for voting).  Effort is underway to construct another bill requiring photo ID for voting, for consideration in next year’s session.

As noted in my previous Update, the Governor has also vetoed HB 474 (right to work), HB 218 (eliminating the Rail Transit Authority), HB 542 (strengthens parents’ rights to prevent their children’s exposure to objectionable material in school), HB 380 (extending the Commission on the Status of Men), and SB 57 (allowing car title loans).  It appears likely that there are insufficient votes to override.

Read more »

A Session of Legislative Achievements

Restoring Fiscal Responsibility:

  • The legislature passed a budget 11% smaller that the prior budget, reducing spending by over $1.2 billion and general fund spending by $536 million, or 18%.
  • The state budget includes no new or increased taxes or fees.
  • This budget does not bond any operating costs or do any additional borrowing from our future generations while using responsible revenue estimates.
  • The state will return $666,000 in ObamaCare funds to the federal government with instructions to use these dollars for debt reduction.

Growing our Economy and Spurring Job Creation through Tax and Fee Relief:

  • This budget eliminates the auto registration surcharge, which was costing our residents and small businesses between $30 and $75 every year for each vehicle they registered, putting $90 million back in our citizens’ pockets.
  • To fulfill our commitment to reduce the highest business tax rate in the nation, new laws offer three forms of tax relief to employers to help them grow their business: reforming the burden of proof for reasonable compensation, doubling the carryforward period for the BET and expanding the net operating loss carryforward for the BPT by 900%.
  • Two new statutes help our retailers, particularly those in borders communities, become more competitive and grow: eliminating the gambling winnings tax and repealing the most recent of the four tobacco taxes in the past six years.
  • The legislature also cut a number of fees on restaurants, hotels, motel, pet stores, fishing enthusiasts, those selling condominiums, and people getting married.
  • Cities and towns that are impacted by fire or other major acts of nature are now eligible for community revitalization tax relief to allow for the repair or rebuilding of damaged structures.
  • A new law directs the Business Finance Authority to establish an innovation business job growth initiative to promote investment in New Hampshire employers and to coordinate venture capital with start ups statewide.

Reducing the Regulatory Burden on New Hampshire:

  • The legislature enacted 43 laws to reduce regulation in New Hampshire this year to allow employers more flexibility and opportunity to grow and create jobs.
  • Industries and groups that have benefited from reduced regulations include: haulers and shippers, boatmakers, homeowners, insurance carriers, banking and trust institutions, grocers, hunting and fishing guides, small electricity generators, rural hospitals, restaurants and taverns, retailers, electricians, landlords, forest and timber workers, child care, funeral directors, employee leasing companies, pharmaceutical distributors, those selling fireworks, pet stores and breeders, small brewers, home builders, real estate brokers and salespeople, developers, ski facility operators, wine makers, road contractors, automobile dealers and pharmacists.
  • This session, the legislature repealed a number of outdated and unnecessary laws.  The repealed laws included: restrictions on the sale of oleomargarine, artificial flowers and miniature flags, a ban on the sale of stove polish, a number of unenforced election laws and the state minimum wage, which is made unnecessary by the federal minimum wage law.
  • The legislature repealed New Hampshire’s “card check” law and restored the secret ballot to state workers for whether or not they want to form a labor union at their employer’s business.
  • The Department of Labor is now required to warn employers before assessing fines for violations, developing a consultative approach, rather than adversarial.
  • A new commission will review business regulations in New Hampshire to identify further areas to reduce the burden and make compliance simpler and less costly to employers.

Fixing New Hampshire’s broken Retirement System

  • A major achievement for this legislature was moving forward to repair the state’s retirement system and its unfunded liability that exceeds $3.7 billion.
  • The reform effort included plans to ask public sector employees to support their pensions, just as private sector workers do today.
  • Another law reforms the abuses in “spiking” public pensions that can allow public employees to game the system and take home enormous pensions.
  • The legislature also took steps to stop abusive “double dipping” – where retired workers collect a pension while holding a similar job at a near full-time level.

Enhancing Public Safety

  • The Kimberly Cates law gives prosecutors the ability to seek the death penalty in the event that a criminal commits a murder during a home invasion.
  • The legislature tightened the law regarding the revoking of a driver’s license for those under 21 who are convicted of a drug or alcohol crime.
  • A new law allows communities and private entities to utilize a pharmaceutical drug take-back program to ensure that unused drugs are not used inappropriately.
  • A new legislative committee will review the state’s parole system to ensure that the public is safe before any parolee is released.
  • The legislature restored the authority of the Parole Board to keep violent criminals behind bars by remove mandatory nine-month parole for sexual and violent offenders and allow parole violators to spend more than 90 days back in prison.
  • The state must now notify rape victims if the perpetrator was found incompetent to stand trial and is going to be released.

Protecting Local and County Property Taxpayers

  • Local governments can now legally enforce municipal property tax and spending caps to limit growth in their communities, thanks to a new law.
  • A new law eliminates the “evergreen” requirement that all communities continue public employee contracts after they expire.
  • The new education funding formula guarantees that all communities will have stability in education aid funding for the next two years by ensuring that they will maintain the same levels as last year.
  • The legislature lifted a number of restrictions on communities and counties, including: making it easier to transfer funds, strengthen collective bargaining rights for cities and towns, allowing counties more investment opportunities, removing permit application waiting periods for town road work if it meets best practice standards, limiting local liability for dog bites, providing more flexibility for communities to appoint members to volunteer boards and giving communities a chance to adjust their school and municipal budgets based on education funding changes at the state level.
  • Teachers will now wait five years, instead of three, before receiving tenure, giving schools more time to evaluate their performance to ensure that students get high quality instruction in classrooms.

Protecting Individual Liberty and Families

  • A new law removes the requirement that older drivers must take an additional test to prove that they are “qualified” to drive when they turn 75.
  • The state can no longer have federally-funded checkpoints that exclusively target motorcycle drivers.
  • The legislature abolished the database that collected information on uninsured individuals across New Hampshire.
  • A law protects the right of law abiding citizens to own or use knives without interference from local governments.
  • The state will prohibit using race, religion, sex or sexual preference in hiring, promoting, recruiting or admissions for state agencies or universities.
  • Two bills protect parents’ rights by requiring parental notification of a minor before having an abortion and parental consent for a court to refer a child to a juvenile diversion program.
  • The legislature affirmed property rights by protecting doctors and nurses’ funds from being taken by the state and by restoring the right to appeal for homeowners for the assessments of their homes if they do not show the property to local assessors.
  • State law now protects individuals from being forced to purchase health insurance or to face a fine if they have not purchased health insurance.

Increasing Transparency in State Government

  • The state will now post its checkbook online, to allow the public to see where their money is going, in an easy and simple format.
  • A new law authorizes relevant legislative policy committees to hold public hearings and review state agencies rules.
  • The legislature extended the review and public input process of the Financial Resources Mortgage scandal and examination of state agencies’ role to ensure that a similar situation does not happen again.
  • A law makes public details of accidents involving state, county and local employees and officials in vehicles paid for by taxpayers.
  • The media may now make public the fact that an individual has a criminal record, even if that record has since been annulled.

Improving the Efficiency of State Government

  • A new law requires state agencies to update their forms, so that the public does not have to waste time filling out unnecessary paperwork.
  • The court system has been overhauled to eliminate the probate, family and district courts, merging them into the circuit court, saving more than $38 million over 10 years, while also ensuring that furlough days are over, allowing speedy access to justice for our citizens.
  • The legislature directed the state’s Medicaid program to move to a managed care model, which will improve the health of Medicaid recipients, ensure better use of health care and save taxpayers millions of dollars.
  • State department heads can now transfer employees throughout their agencies to allow targeting of resources, better customer services and the ability to operate with fewer workers.
  • State tax collectors will now take credit and debit card, making it easier for taxpayers and employers to pay their bills, while reducing state paperwork.
  • The legislature returned the responsibility for weights and measures back to the private sector, while reducing fees in the process.
  • A new law requires the state to consolidate front office and back office functions through a shared services model combining all state agencies under one roof.
  • The Judiciary and Department of Safety can now use video teleconference for administrative hearings and motor vehicle cases, saving travel costs and time.
  • State agencies must now submit budget proposals that include a 10% reduction in state spending, in addition to budgets that grow government.
  • The State Board of Education is no longer restricted in the number of charter school that may operate in New Hampshire, providing an alternative to and competition for traditional school statewide.

Vetoes Remaining for Legislative Action

  • Legislation to allow employees free choice to join or not join a union, or not to pay union fees as a condition of employment, awaits a veto override.
  • A bill to ensure the integrity of the election process by requiring that voters must show a photo ID to vote will receive an override vote.
  • Gun owners’ rights will be protected with a veto override to allow gun owners to stand their ground when threatened, to display a firearm and to prevent civil lawsuits from those who threaten gun owners.
  • The Rail Transit Authority will need legislative approval before using taxpayers’ funds when the Governor’s veto is overridden.
  • A bill to protect parents’ rights by allowing parents to remove their children from objectionable course material in public schools faces an override vote.
  • New Hampshire citizens will again be given the opportunity to access title loans on their cars if a veto override passes.

 

July 16, 2011 Legislative Update

Passing the state budget by a veto-proof majority was the major legislative event in June (Governor Lynch decided to allow it to become law without his signature).   The budget included the public employee pension reforms put into SB 3 (which the Governor had previously vetoed) and making the requirements to meet the Shoreline Protection Act less onerous on citizens living near streams, marshes or other bodies of water.  Unfortunately, the public service unions have decided to challenge the pension reforms in state court.  If their challenge is successful, substantial additional layoffs of public employees will be required to meet our budget, since employees’ average cost of benefits is 52% of their salary, and the budget assumes $50 million in savings through reforms.

I voted with the majority of the Legislature to successfully override Governor Lynch’s veto of HB 329 (parental notification of abortions), HB 133 (tying NH minimum wage to Federal levels), and HB 109 (prohibiting the requirement to put sprinklers in residences).  The argument against HB 329 was based on concern that involving parents might be inappropriate in cases of rape, incest and abuse, and that there was inadequate protection for the health of the mother.  I feel that the bill provided for judicial bypass and deferring to doctor’s judgment when needed, and that the critical importance of parents being involved in serious medical issues concerning their children overrode the risks.  The argument against HB 133 was that NH needs to be able to set the minimum wage higher than federal levels at times.  I feel that government-set minimum wages deprive low-skilled entry-level employees the opportunity to get a job, thereby denying the chance to develop skills and thus increase value to the employer.  Minimum wages create particular problems for young black males, who consequently suffer high unemployment rates.  The argument against HB 109 is that the state should not override local government decisions.  I feel that residential sprinklers may not be the best fireproofing strategy.  Smoke alarms are better vehicles for personal protection, and false alarms with sprinklers can cause significant property damage.  Exceptions can be handled by giving homeowners options.

Read more »

Powered by WordPress | Get Cheap or Free T-Mobile Cell Phones Online. | Thanks to Best Savings Accounts, Credit Cards and Reverse lookup